Difference between revisions of "Crataegus chrysocarpa var. subrotundifolia"

(Sargent) J. B. Phipps

J. Bot. Res. Inst. Texas 3: 240. 2009.

Endemic
Basionym: Crataegus subrotundifolia Sargent
Synonyms: C. coccinata Sargent
Treatment appears in FNA Volume 9. Treatment on page 599. Mentioned on page 598.
FNA>Volume Importer
 
FNA>Volume Importer
Line 33: Line 33:
 
|elevation=0–400 m
 
|elevation=0–400 m
 
|distribution=Alta.;Ont.;Que.;Sask.;Mass.;Mich.;N.Y.;Vt.;Wis.
 
|distribution=Alta.;Ont.;Que.;Sask.;Mass.;Mich.;N.Y.;Vt.;Wis.
|discussion=<p>Nearly all Cypress Hills (Alberta and Saskatchewan) specimens of Crataegus chrysocarpa match the characteristics of var. subrotundifolia, but they are evidently different from the eastern form representing the type.</p><!--
+
|discussion=<p>Nearly all Cypress Hills (Alberta and Saskatchewan) specimens of <i>Crataegus chrysocarpa</i> match the characteristics of <i></i>var.<i> subrotundifolia</i>, but they are evidently different from the eastern form representing the type.</p><!--
--><p>Variety subrotundifolia is a weakly differentiated variety originally held to be restricted to the southern section of the eastern part of the range of Crataegus chrysocarpa, where it is locally common. In plants from this area, the leaves are more coriaceous and a darker green, and the fruit is a deeper, richer red than those of sympatric var. chrysocarpa.</p>
+
--><p>Variety subrotundifolia is a weakly differentiated variety originally held to be restricted to the southern section of the eastern part of the range of <i>Crataegus chrysocarpa</i>, where it is locally common. In plants from this area, the leaves are more coriaceous and a darker green, and the fruit is a deeper, richer red than those of sympatric <i></i>var.<i> chrysocarpa</i>.</p>
 
|tables=
 
|tables=
 
|references=
 
|references=
Line 58: Line 58:
 
|publication year=2009
 
|publication year=2009
 
|special status=Endemic
 
|special status=Endemic
|source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/9216fc802291cd3df363fd52122300479582ede7/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V9/V9_1026.xml
+
|source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/8f726806613d60c220dc4493de13607dd3150896/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V9/V9_1026.xml
 
|subfamily=Rosaceae subfam. Amygdaloideae
 
|subfamily=Rosaceae subfam. Amygdaloideae
 
|tribe=Rosaceae tribe Gillenieae
 
|tribe=Rosaceae tribe Gillenieae

Revision as of 19:14, 18 September 2019

Shrubs, 20–30 dm. Leaves: blade ovate to rhombic-obovate, base ± cuneate, sinuses: max LII 15–20%, lobe apex acute, veins 3–5 per side, abaxial surface glabrous, adaxial appressed-pubescent young, glabrescent or becoming short-scabrous. Inflorescences: branches thin-pilose. Flowers 15–20 mm diam.; hypanthium glabrous; stamens 10, anthers cream or ivory. Pomes red, suborbicular, 8–10 mm diam., pubescent or glabrous.


Phenology: Flowering May–Jun; fruiting Sep–Oct.
Habitat: Brush
Elevation: 0–400 m

Distribution

V9 1026-distribution-map.jpg

Alta., Ont., Que., Sask., Mass., Mich., N.Y., Vt., Wis.

Discussion

Nearly all Cypress Hills (Alberta and Saskatchewan) specimens of Crataegus chrysocarpa match the characteristics of var. subrotundifolia, but they are evidently different from the eastern form representing the type.

Variety subrotundifolia is a weakly differentiated variety originally held to be restricted to the southern section of the eastern part of the range of Crataegus chrysocarpa, where it is locally common. In plants from this area, the leaves are more coriaceous and a darker green, and the fruit is a deeper, richer red than those of sympatric var. chrysocarpa.

Selected References

None.

Lower Taxa

None.
James B. Phipps +
(Sargent) J. B. Phipps +
Crataegus subrotundifolia +
Alta. +, Ont. +, Que. +, Sask. +, Mass. +, Mich. +, N.Y. +, Vt. +  and Wis. +
0–400 m +
Brush +
Flowering May–Jun +  and fruiting Sep–Oct. +
J. Bot. Res. Inst. Texas +
C. coccinata +
Crataegus chrysocarpa var. subrotundifolia +
Crataegus chrysocarpa +
variety +