Difference between revisions of "Horkelia congesta"

Douglas ex Hooker

Bot. Mag. 56: plate 2880. 1829.

Conservation concernEndemic
Synonyms: Potentilla congesta (Douglas ex Hooker) Baillon
Treatment appears in FNA Volume 9. Treatment on page 267. Mentioned on page 264, 268, 269.
FNA>Volume Importer
FNA>Volume Importer
Line 18: Line 18:
 
|name=Potentilla congesta
 
|name=Potentilla congesta
 
|authority=(Douglas ex Hooker) Baillon
 
|authority=(Douglas ex Hooker) Baillon
 +
|rank=species
 
}}
 
}}
 
|hierarchy=Rosaceae;Rosaceae subfam. Rosoideae;Rosaceae tribe Potentilleae;Horkelia;Horkelia sect. Tridentatae;Horkelia congesta
 
|hierarchy=Rosaceae;Rosaceae subfam. Rosoideae;Rosaceae tribe Potentilleae;Horkelia;Horkelia sect. Tridentatae;Horkelia congesta
Line 31: Line 32:
 
|distribution=w United States.
 
|distribution=w United States.
 
|discussion=<p>Varieties 2 (2 in the flora).</p><!--
 
|discussion=<p>Varieties 2 (2 in the flora).</p><!--
--><p>As discussed by D. D. Keck (1938) and analyzed by T. N. Kaye (unpubl., Oregon Dept. of Agriculture, 1995), <i>Horkelia congesta</i> comprises three population clusters that form a latitudinal gradient in Oregon west of the Cascade Range, transitioning to <i>H. tridentata</i> in the mountains of California. Populations of <i>H. congesta</i> in remnant prairies in the Willamette Valley (probably including the type of <i>H. hirsuta</i> Lindley) have relatively tall, erect stems, pectinate stipules, relatively numerous, narrow leaflets, openly branched inflorescences with flowers in corymbiform clusters, and clawed petals 5–6 × 4–5 mm. In contrast, populations centered in rocky serpentine flats within the Illinois River drainage in Josephine County, which were described by Keck as subsp. nemorosa, tend to have shorter ascending stems, less divided stipules, fewer and broader leaflets, more capitate inflorescences, and scarcely clawed petals 3–4 × 2–3 mm. The differences between these two extremes are blurred by populations from the Umpqua Valley in Douglas County (the probable type locality of <i>H. congesta</i>), as well as scattered populations in northern Jackson and Josephine counties. Based on morphometric analyses of 19 characters, Kaye concluded that the Umpqua material overlapped slightly with plants from the Willamette Valley, while the Josephine County populations clustered separately. He retained the Umpqua and Willamette valley populations as <i></i></i>subsp.<i><i> congesta</i>, with mid stem stipule features of greatest diagnostic value. This taxonomic conclusion is adopted here, with a change of rank from subspecies to variety.</p>
+
--><p>As discussed by D. D. Keck (1938) and analyzed by T. N. Kaye (unpubl., Oregon Dept. of Agriculture, 1995), <i>Horkelia congesta</i> comprises three population clusters that form a latitudinal gradient in Oregon west of the Cascade Range, transitioning to <i>H. tridentata</i> in the mountains of California. Populations of <i>H. congesta</i> in remnant prairies in the Willamette Valley (probably including the type of <i>H. hirsuta</i> Lindley) have relatively tall, erect stems, pectinate stipules, relatively numerous, narrow leaflets, openly branched inflorescences with flowers in corymbiform clusters, and clawed petals 5–6 × 4–5 mm. In contrast, populations centered in rocky serpentine flats within the Illinois River drainage in Josephine County, which were described by Keck as subsp. nemorosa, tend to have shorter ascending stems, less divided stipules, fewer and broader leaflets, more capitate inflorescences, and scarcely clawed petals 3–4 × 2–3 mm. The differences between these two extremes are blurred by populations from the Umpqua Valley in Douglas County (the probable type locality of <i>H. congesta</i>), as well as scattered populations in northern Jackson and Josephine counties. Based on morphometric analyses of 19 characters, Kaye concluded that the Umpqua material overlapped slightly with plants from the Willamette Valley, while the Josephine County populations clustered separately. He retained the Umpqua and Willamette valley populations as <i></i>subsp.<i> congesta</i>, with mid stem stipule features of greatest diagnostic value. This taxonomic conclusion is adopted here, with a change of rank from subspecies to variety.</p>
 
|tables=
 
|tables=
 
|references=
 
|references=
Line 54: Line 55:
 
-->{{#Taxon:
 
-->{{#Taxon:
 
name=Horkelia congesta
 
name=Horkelia congesta
|author=
 
 
|authority=Douglas ex Hooker
 
|authority=Douglas ex Hooker
 
|rank=species
 
|rank=species
Line 66: Line 66:
 
|publication year=1829
 
|publication year=1829
 
|special status=Conservation concern;Endemic
 
|special status=Conservation concern;Endemic
|source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/f6b125a955440c0872999024f038d74684f65921/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V9/V9_426.xml
+
|source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/f50eec43f223ca0e34566be0b046453a0960e173/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V9/V9_426.xml
 
|subfamily=Rosaceae subfam. Rosoideae
 
|subfamily=Rosaceae subfam. Rosoideae
 
|tribe=Rosaceae tribe Potentilleae
 
|tribe=Rosaceae tribe Potentilleae

Revision as of 23:40, 16 December 2019

Plants tufted or rosette-forming, green to grayish green. Stems ascending to erect, 1.5–5 dm, hairs 2–3 mm proximally, glands dense distally. Basal leaves ± planar, (3–)4–15 × 1–3 cm, usually villous at least abaxially, often densely so; stipules entire, deeply 2-lobed, or pinnately divided into 3–5 linear lobes; leaflets 2–6 per side, ± separate, narrowly cuneate or lanceolate-elliptic to oblong, 5–20 × (1–)2–5(–6) mm, 1/5–1/2 as wide as long, divided 1/6–1/4 or less to midrib into (0–)3(–5) ± ovate teeth 1–2 mm wide, these restricted to apex. Cauline leaves 2–7; stipules 5–25(–30) mm, divided 3/4+ into linear or linear-lanceolate lobes, or incompletely divided or divided no more than 2/3 into lanceolate, often acuminate teeth. Inflorescences open to congested, flowers usually arranged in ± capitate glomerules or corymbiform clusters. Pedicels 1–3(–6) mm. Flowers 8–16 mm diam.; epicalyx bractlets linear to lanceolate or narrowly elliptic, 1–3 × 0.3–0.8 mm, ± 2/3 length of sepals; hypanthium 2–2.5 × 3–4.5 mm, ± 1/2 to nearly as deep as wide, interior usually glabrous, sometimes sparsely pilose; sepals spreading, abaxially green, 2–4.5 mm; petals white to cream, ± obovate, (2.5–)3–6 × (1.5–)2–5 mm, apex ± rounded to ± emarginate; filaments (0.5–)1–2 × (0.2–)0.4–0.6 mm, anthers 0.4–0.7(–1) mm; carpels (6–)10–15(–20), styles 1.5–3 mm. Achenes brown, 1.6–2.2 mm, faintly rugose.

Discussion

Varieties 2 (2 in the flora).

As discussed by D. D. Keck (1938) and analyzed by T. N. Kaye (unpubl., Oregon Dept. of Agriculture, 1995), Horkelia congesta comprises three population clusters that form a latitudinal gradient in Oregon west of the Cascade Range, transitioning to H. tridentata in the mountains of California. Populations of H. congesta in remnant prairies in the Willamette Valley (probably including the type of H. hirsuta Lindley) have relatively tall, erect stems, pectinate stipules, relatively numerous, narrow leaflets, openly branched inflorescences with flowers in corymbiform clusters, and clawed petals 5–6 × 4–5 mm. In contrast, populations centered in rocky serpentine flats within the Illinois River drainage in Josephine County, which were described by Keck as subsp. nemorosa, tend to have shorter ascending stems, less divided stipules, fewer and broader leaflets, more capitate inflorescences, and scarcely clawed petals 3–4 × 2–3 mm. The differences between these two extremes are blurred by populations from the Umpqua Valley in Douglas County (the probable type locality of H. congesta), as well as scattered populations in northern Jackson and Josephine counties. Based on morphometric analyses of 19 characters, Kaye concluded that the Umpqua material overlapped slightly with plants from the Willamette Valley, while the Josephine County populations clustered separately. He retained the Umpqua and Willamette valley populations as subsp. congesta, with mid stem stipule features of greatest diagnostic value. This taxonomic conclusion is adopted here, with a change of rank from subspecies to variety.

Selected References

None.

Key

1 Cauline leaves: stipules divided 3/4+ into linear to linear-lanceolate lobes; inflorescences composed of ± corymbiform clusters to capitate glomerules; petals (3–)4–6 × (2–)3–5 mm; remnant prairies, Willamette and Umpqua valleys, Oregon. Horkelia congesta var. congesta
1 Cauline leaves: stipules incompletely divided or divided no more than 2/3 into lanceolate, often acuminate teeth; inflorescences usually composed of ± capitate glomerules; petals 2.5–3(–4) × (1.5–)2–3 mm; serpentine flats, Illinois River drainage, Oregon, and Del Norte County, California. Horkelia congesta var. nemorosa