Difference between revisions of "Lewisia columbiana var. rupicola"
in C. L. Hitchcock et al., Vasc. Pl. Pacif. N.W. 2: 232. 1964.
Endemic
Basionym: Lewisia rupicola English Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash. 47: 190. 1934
Synonyms: Lewisia columbiana subsp. rupicola (English) Ferris
Treatment appears in FNA Volume 4. Treatment on page 479.
imported>Volume Importer |
imported>Volume Importer |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Treatment/ID | {{Treatment/ID | ||
|accepted_name=Lewisia columbiana var. rupicola | |accepted_name=Lewisia columbiana var. rupicola | ||
| − | |accepted_authority=(English) C. L. Hitchcock | + | |accepted_authority=(English) C. L. Hitchcock |
|publications={{Treatment/Publication | |publications={{Treatment/Publication | ||
|title=in C. L. Hitchcock et al., Vasc. Pl. Pacif. N.W. | |title=in C. L. Hitchcock et al., Vasc. Pl. Pacif. N.W. | ||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
-->{{#Taxon: | -->{{#Taxon: | ||
name=Lewisia columbiana var. rupicola | name=Lewisia columbiana var. rupicola | ||
| − | |authority=(English) C. L. Hitchcock | + | |authority=(English) C. L. Hitchcock |
|rank=variety | |rank=variety | ||
|parent rank=species | |parent rank=species | ||
| Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
|publication year=1964 | |publication year=1964 | ||
|special status=Endemic | |special status=Endemic | ||
| − | |source xml=https:// | + | |source xml=https://bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation/src/2e0870ddd59836b60bcf96646a41e87ea5a5943a/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V4/V4_964.xml |
|genus=Lewisia | |genus=Lewisia | ||
|species=Lewisia columbiana | |species=Lewisia columbiana | ||
Latest revision as of 23:02, 5 November 2020
Basal leaf blades ± linear, mostly 2–3 cm. Cauline leaves usually absent. Inflorescences: basalmost bract margins glandular-toothed. Petals pale pink to deep purple-magenta or rose, (10–)12–13 mm. 2n = 30.
Phenology: Flowering late spring–summer.
Habitat: Exposed slopes
Elevation: 800-1700 m
Distribution
B.C., Oreg., Wash.
Discussion
B. Mathew (1989b) noted that the cultivated Lewisia columbiana ‘Rosea’ is this variety. B. L. Davidson (2000) noted that the United States populations have pink to magenta petals, whereas the British Columbia populations have white to pale pink petals characteristic of the other varieties. Mathew questioned the assignment of the British Columbia plants to this variety.
Selected References
None.
Lower Taxa
None.