Difference between revisions of "Perityle fosteri"

A. M. Powell

Madroño 30: 217, fig. 1. 1983.

Common names: Foster’s rock daisy
EndemicConservation concern
Treatment appears in FNA Volume 21. Treatment on page 319. Mentioned on page 318.
FNA>Volume Importer
 
imported>Volume Importer
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
 
}}
 
}}
 
|common_names=Foster’s rock daisy
 
|common_names=Foster’s rock daisy
 +
|special_status={{Treatment/ID/Special_status
 +
|code=E
 +
|label=Endemic
 +
}}{{Treatment/ID/Special_status
 +
|code=C
 +
|label=Conservation concern
 +
}}
 
|basionyms=
 
|basionyms=
 
|synonyms=
 
|synonyms=
Line 25: Line 32:
 
|distribution=Tex.
 
|distribution=Tex.
 
|discussion=<p>Of conservation concern.</p><!--
 
|discussion=<p>Of conservation concern.</p><!--
--><p>Perityle fosteri, possibly a close relative of P. rupestris, is known only from Culberson County.</p>
+
--><p><i>Perityle fosteri</i>, possibly a close relative of <i>P. rupestris</i>, is known only from Culberson County.</p>
 
|tables=
 
|tables=
 
|references=
 
|references=
Line 34: Line 41:
 
-->{{#Taxon:
 
-->{{#Taxon:
 
name=Perityle fosteri
 
name=Perityle fosteri
|author=
 
 
|authority=A. M. Powell
 
|authority=A. M. Powell
 
|rank=species
 
|rank=species
Line 48: Line 54:
 
|publication title=Madroño
 
|publication title=Madroño
 
|publication year=1983
 
|publication year=1983
|special status=
+
|special status=Endemic;Conservation concern
|source xml=https://jpend@bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation.git/src/9216fc802291cd3df363fd52122300479582ede7/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V19-20-21/V21_791.xml
+
|source xml=https://bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation/src/2e0870ddd59836b60bcf96646a41e87ea5a5943a/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V19-20-21/V21_791.xml
 
|tribe=Asteraceae tribe Heliantheae
 
|tribe=Asteraceae tribe Heliantheae
 
|subtribe=Asteraceae (tribe Heliantheae) subtribe Peritylinae
 
|subtribe=Asteraceae (tribe Heliantheae) subtribe Peritylinae

Latest revision as of 21:14, 5 November 2020

Plants 6–15 cm (forming mats on rock faces, profusely branched, leafy); short-hairy. Leaves: petioles 4–8 mm; blades ± ovate to deltate overall, 5–12 × 5–12 mm, 3-lobed, ultimate margins entire. Heads borne singly or in corymbiform arrays, 6–7 × ca. 4 mm. Peduncles 2–5 mm. Involucres funnelform-cylindric. Phyllaries ca. 8, linear-lanceolate, 5–6 × 0.8–1.3 mm. Disc florets ca. 10; corollas cream to pale yellow, tubes 1 mm, throats tubular-funnelform, 3 mm, lobes 0.5 mm. Cypselae 1.5–1.6 mm; pappi of ca. 20 bristles 1–2 mm. 2n = 34.


Phenology: Flowering spring–fall.
Habitat: Rock faces in protected canyons
Elevation: 1500–1660 m

Discussion

Of conservation concern.

Perityle fosteri, possibly a close relative of P. rupestris, is known only from Culberson County.

Selected References

None.

Lower Taxa

None.
... more about "Perityle fosteri"
Sharon C. Yarborough +  and A. Michael Powell +
A. M. Powell +
Laphamia sect. Pappothrix +
Foster’s rock daisy +
1500–1660 m +
Rock faces in protected canyons +
Flowering spring–fall. +
Endemic +  and Conservation concern +
Undefined sect. Pappothrix +
Perityle fosteri +
Perityle sect. Pappothrix +
species +