Difference between revisions of "Phytolacca heterotepala"
in H. G. A. Engler, Pflanzenr. 83[IV,39]: 51. 1909.
FNA>Volume Importer |
imported>Volume Importer |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Treatment/ID | {{Treatment/ID | ||
|accepted_name=Phytolacca heterotepala | |accepted_name=Phytolacca heterotepala | ||
| − | |accepted_authority=H. Walter | + | |accepted_authority=H. Walter |
|publications={{Treatment/Publication | |publications={{Treatment/Publication | ||
|title=in H. G. A. Engler, Pflanzenr. | |title=in H. G. A. Engler, Pflanzenr. | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
}} | }} | ||
|common_names=Mexican pokeweed | |common_names=Mexican pokeweed | ||
| + | |special_status={{Treatment/ID/Special_status | ||
| + | |code=I | ||
| + | |label=Introduced | ||
| + | }} | ||
|basionyms= | |basionyms= | ||
|synonyms= | |synonyms= | ||
| Line 24: | Line 28: | ||
|elevation=10-60 m | |elevation=10-60 m | ||
|distribution=Calif.;Mexico;introduced in Europe. | |distribution=Calif.;Mexico;introduced in Europe. | ||
| − | |discussion=<p>Phytolacca heterotepala was first reported in the flora area by J. T. Howell (1960) on the basis of California (San Francisco) collections. Its current status in the flora is uncertain; J. C. Hickman (1993) recorded it as “probably not naturalized.” The few specimens we have seen possess in greater-or-lesser degree those features cited by H. P. H. Walter (1909) in his description of this taxon. The sepals are strikingly unequal, the largest being up to twice as wide as the smallest, and the stamens appearing to be in two whorls. The status of the species itself is in need of further investigation.</p> | + | |introduced=true |
| + | |discussion=<p><i>Phytolacca heterotepala</i> was first reported in the flora area by J. T. Howell (1960) on the basis of California (San Francisco) collections. Its current status in the flora is uncertain; J. C. Hickman (1993) recorded it as “probably not naturalized.” The few specimens we have seen possess in greater-or-lesser degree those features cited by H. P. H. Walter (1909) in his description of this taxon. The sepals are strikingly unequal, the largest being up to twice as wide as the smallest, and the stamens appearing to be in two whorls. The status of the species itself is in need of further investigation.</p> | ||
|tables= | |tables= | ||
|references={{Treatment/Reference | |references={{Treatment/Reference | ||
| Line 36: | Line 41: | ||
-->{{#Taxon: | -->{{#Taxon: | ||
name=Phytolacca heterotepala | name=Phytolacca heterotepala | ||
| − | + | |authority=H. Walter | |
| − | |authority=H. Walter | ||
|rank=species | |rank=species | ||
|parent rank=genus | |parent rank=genus | ||
| Line 51: | Line 55: | ||
|publication title=in H. G. A. Engler, Pflanzenr. | |publication title=in H. G. A. Engler, Pflanzenr. | ||
|publication year=1909 | |publication year=1909 | ||
| − | |special status= | + | |special status=Introduced |
| − | |source xml=https:// | + | |source xml=https://bitbucket.org/aafc-mbb/fna-data-curation/src/2e0870ddd59836b60bcf96646a41e87ea5a5943a/coarse_grained_fna_xml/V4/V4_12.xml |
|genus=Phytolacca | |genus=Phytolacca | ||
|species=Phytolacca heterotepala | |species=Phytolacca heterotepala | ||
Latest revision as of 22:56, 5 November 2020
Plants to 2.5 m. Leaves: petiole to 5 cm; blade lanceolate to ovate, to 13 × 6 cm, base obtuse, apex acute to acute-mucronate. Ra-cemes open, mostly axillary, to 25 cm; peduncle to 5.5 cm; pedicel 2–5 mm. Flowers: sepals 5(–8), greenish, oblong, strikingly unequal, largest ca. twice as wide as smallest, 3–4 × 1.5–2.2 mm; stamens 15–22, usually in 2 whorls; carpels 8–11, connate; ovary 8–11-loculed. Berries purple-black, 6–7 mm diam. Seeds black, lenticular, 2–2.5 mm, shiny.
Phenology: Flowering summer–winter.
Habitat: Disturbed ground
Elevation: 10-60 m
Distribution
Introduced; Calif., Mexico, introduced in Europe.
Discussion
Phytolacca heterotepala was first reported in the flora area by J. T. Howell (1960) on the basis of California (San Francisco) collections. Its current status in the flora is uncertain; J. C. Hickman (1993) recorded it as “probably not naturalized.” The few specimens we have seen possess in greater-or-lesser degree those features cited by H. P. H. Walter (1909) in his description of this taxon. The sepals are strikingly unequal, the largest being up to twice as wide as the smallest, and the stamens appearing to be in two whorls. The status of the species itself is in need of further investigation.